Category quality
Context aware
Assign categories using richer transaction context.
TX Enrichment / Categorization
Find the why behind every transaction
Consistently categorize transactions to uncover the bigger picture.
Classify transaction intent into stable categories that support better product logic, risk controls, and reporting.
Category Mapper
Intent labeling with hierarchy
Primary and secondary category layers stay consistent across workflows.
PrimarySecondaryTaxonomy map
TransactionHYPER MART 4821
PrimaryGroceries
SecondaryHousehold essentials
Category outputs remain adaptable to internal taxonomy systems.
Categories tailored to your users
Apply different category systems for consumer and business contexts while keeping the enrichment layer consistent underneath.
Compare consumer-friendly and business-ready interpretations of the same transaction.
Support category outputs that fit the user experience instead of forcing one universal taxonomy.
Keep reporting and decision systems aligned as category context shifts by product surface.
Personalize our categories
Adapt Mazerik outputs to your existing taxonomy with rules and mappings instead of rebuilding your full stack.
Map standard outputs into internal taxonomies.
Preserve category confidence while tailoring labels for your product.
Systematically categorize entities with logic teams can maintain over time.
Categorization designed for operational consistency
Category outputs stay aligned across teams so product, risk, and finance can rely on one interpretation layer.
Workflow fit
Policy friendly
Use outputs in rule engines and manual review paths.
System alignment
Taxonomy adaptable
Map outputs to your internal category models.
How teams apply categorization in practice
Category intelligence supports product experiences and internal operations when outputs remain consistent.
Risk
Spending pattern interpretation
Use category distributions to support affordability review and policy-based risk decisioning.
Operations
Exception and dispute workflows
Route cases by category context to prioritize teams and streamline handling paths.
Finance
Internal reporting normalization
Maintain stable spend segmentation for analysis and planning across variable source feeds.
Categorization workflow teams can adopt incrementally
Introduce categorization in controlled steps and extend coverage as team confidence and policy maturity increase.
Ingest transaction and entity context
Start with enriched transaction records that include counterparty and payment context.
Apply category intelligence
Assign primary and secondary category labels aligned to operational use cases.
Map to internal taxonomy
Connect standardized outputs to your internal product, risk, or reporting schemas.
Workflow view
Taxonomy alignment board
Map standardized categories into internal product and reporting models.
Workflow view
Taxonomy alignment board
Map standardized categories into internal product and reporting models.
StandardizedInternal mappingRule-safe
StandardTransport · Fuel
InternalMobility · Required
Policy statusAccepted
Category translation happens without breaking downstream reporting logic.
Category architecture and API field model
Category layers are structured for both default usage and internal taxonomy mapping in production workflows.
Classification core
Generate category outputs from normalized transaction and entity context.
Taxonomy bridge
Translate standard categories into internal labels without rewriting your enrichment pipeline.
Operational delivery
Serve category outputs consistently for product features and internal tools.
Categorization API field sample
category.primary
string
Main category label for the transaction.
category.secondary
string
More specific category breakdown when applicable.
category.source
string
Classification pathway metadata for review.
category.confidence
number
Confidence indicator for policy workflows.
Categorization FAQs
Common implementation and operations questions for category-based transaction workflows.
Can categories be adapted to our internal taxonomy?
Yes. Teams can map standardized outputs into internal category frameworks for compatibility.
Do category outputs support policy-based workflows?
Yes. Category fields are designed to work in both automated rules and human-review pathways.
Can we use the same category layer for multiple products?
Yes. One categorization layer can support multiple product and operations workflows.
Got the why, now how?
You can use our products via our API or through our intuitive UI dashboard depending on your needs. Your 14-day free trial with 2,000 transactions is just a click away.
Via API or SDK
Do you have developers onboard? Then you can quickly integrate our Python SDK or REST API and get set up in minutes.
Read docsVia the Mazerik Dashboard
No developers onboard? No problem. Our intuitive UI allows you to identify entities using CSVs and PDFs as your data sources.
Get startedBuild with confidence
Join hundreds of companies taking control of their transactions
Mazerik is the most accurate financial data standardization and enrichment API. Any data source, any geography.